The NCAA is considering implementing a coach’s challenge and switching college basketball from halves to quarters for

The NCAA is exploring significant changes to college basketball, including the introduction of a coach’s challenge system and a potential shift from halves to quarters. These proposals aim to enhance game flow, reduce stoppages, and align college basketball more closely with professional standards.

In response to concerns about prolonged video reviews disrupting game pace, the NCAA is considering implementing a coach’s challenge system. Under this proposal, each team would receive one challenge per game, usable only if they possess a timeout. The challenge would apply to key call types such as out-of-bounds and goaltending. If successful, the team would retain the timeout; if unsuccessful, they would lose it. This system aims to streamline the review process and reduce unnecessary stoppages.

ESPN analyst Jay Bilas has advocated for such a system, criticizing the current state where referees spend more time reviewing plays than officiating the game. Bilas suggests that a coach’s challenge would allow for more efficient and timely reviews, particularly in crucial moments.

Another significant proposal under consideration is shifting from the traditional two-halves format to four quarters, aligning with international basketball standards. This change would reset team fouls at the end of each quarter, potentially reducing the number of free throws and improving game flow. However, implementing this change presents challenges, particularly concerning television broadcast contracts that are structured around the current format. Adjusting to a new format would require renegotiating these contracts, which may not be feasible in the short term.

In addition to the coach’s challenge and potential shift to quarters, the NCAA is considering other rule changes to improve the game:

• Continuation Rule: Adjustments to the continuation rule could influence whether baskets count during fouls in shooting situations, aiming for greater consistency in officiating.
• Shot Clock Reset: Proposals to reset the shot clock to 20 seconds after an offensive rebound are under consideration to increase the pace of play.
• Disciplinary Clarifications: Clarifications regarding player suspensions and jersey requirements aim to standardize enforcement and reduce confusion.

The NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel is scheduled to discuss these proposals in an upcoming meeting. If approved, some changes could be implemented as early as the 2025–26 season. However, the transition to quarters may require more time due to the complexities involved with television contracts and scheduling.

The NCAA has emphasized the importance of gathering feedback from coaches, players, and fans before finalizing any rule changes. A joint working group is being formed to collect input and assess the potential impact of these proposals. The goal is to make informed decisions that enhance the game without compromising its integrity.