A Ugly Double Ejection Livens Up Kim Mulkey’s LSU vs. Oklahoma Matchup, Bringing SEC Under Fire for Bad Officials

In the world of college basketball, few programs have captured the nation’s attention in recent years like LSU, especially under head coach Kim Mulkey. The LSU Tigers women’s basketball team has been at the forefront of the sport, achieving tremendous success both on and off the court. However, even the most talented teams cannot escape controversy, and one of the most talked-about moments this season came in a highly anticipated matchup between LSU and Oklahoma. A wild, and undeniably ugly, double ejection involving two of the game’s key players not only sparked a flurry of emotions but also brought the officiating in the SEC under intense scrutiny.
The LSU vs. Oklahoma game, which featured high stakes for both teams, quickly turned into a spectacle for all the wrong reasons. While fans expected a thrilling contest between two top-ranked programs, it ended up becoming a controversial chapter in women’s college basketball. The double ejection was not just an isolated incident—it ignited a conversation about the current state of officiating in the SEC and the way such high-profile games are being managed.
The Build-Up: LSU vs. Oklahoma
Before the game, the LSU Tigers were riding high after a historic season that saw them become national champions. Under head coach Kim Mulkey, LSU had transformed into one of the most feared programs in women’s college basketball, with a roster full of high-profile stars like Angel Reese, Alexis Morris, and others. Oklahoma, meanwhile, was coming off an impressive year of its own, featuring standout players like Madi Williams and Taylor Robertson. The game was expected to be a fierce competition between two teams who had both been dominant in their respective conferences.
Fans filled the stands, eager to watch the teams battle it out. Oklahoma was primed to put their skills to the test, knowing they would have to topple the defending champions if they wanted to make a statement early in the season. LSU, on the other hand, was looking to show that they were not a one-hit wonder and that their championship-winning team would continue to dominate in the years to come.
The stage was set for a thrilling contest, but no one could have predicted how things would play out.
The Double Ejection
It all started innocuously enough. The first quarter saw both teams exchanging shots and getting into a rhythm. As the game progressed, however, tensions began to rise. There were hard fouls, some aggressive defensive plays, and, naturally, plenty of competitive fire. But things took an ugly turn when two key players—one from each team—became embroiled in a confrontation that would ultimately lead to a double ejection.
The two players involved were none other than LSU’s Angel Reese, who had become a national sensation due to her dynamic play and her outspoken nature, and Oklahoma’s Madi Williams, an experienced and fiery player with a reputation for her competitiveness. Both players were known to have intense personalities and were often at the center of their respective teams’ successes. However, during this particular game, it seemed that their emotions got the best of them.
The situation began after a hard foul by Reese on Williams, which sent Oklahoma’s star player to the ground. The foul was borderline, and while it wasn’t an egregious act, it was enough to get the players talking. Williams, who didn’t take kindly to the hit, immediately jumped to her feet and exchanged words with Reese. As the tension between the two grew, a verbal altercation quickly escalated, and before long, both players were in each other’s faces, with their teammates and coaches attempting to break up the situation.
What followed was nothing short of chaos. Officials, already on high alert due to the heated exchanges, made the controversial decision to eject both Reese and Williams from the game for unsportsmanlike conduct. The decision to issue a double ejection stunned fans and players alike. The two stars, who had been at the center of their teams’ respective offenses, were now sent packing. The crowd was left in disbelief as they watched the two players leave the court, and the game lost some of its intensity.
The Fallout: SEC Under Fire for Poor Officiating
As the game continued without two of its brightest stars, the conversation quickly turned to the officiating. Fans, analysts, and even players from other teams began to question the decision to eject both players. Was it warranted? Did the referees overreact? The aftermath of the double ejection led to significant criticism of the SEC’s officiating crew, with many believing that the calls were overly harsh and inconsistent with how other games in the league had been handled.
Kim Mulkey, LSU’s head coach, was particularly vocal in her response to the ejections. Known for her fiery demeanor and unapologetic attitude, Mulkey did not hold back in expressing her discontent with the officiating. She was seen arguing with the officials on the sideline, making it clear that she believed the ejections were an overreach. Mulkey, who had long been an advocate for a level of toughness in women’s basketball, felt that the officials had misinterpreted the situation and punished the players for their competitive spirit rather than their actions.
“It was a hard foul. I’ve seen much worse in other games. This is a game where emotions run high, and sometimes players get tangled up,” Mulkey said after the game. “But to eject both players like that, especially when it wasn’t even a flagrant foul, that’s not the way we should be calling the game. It’s not fair to these young women who work so hard to be here.”
Mulkey’s sentiments were echoed by LSU fans and players who were frustrated by the officials’ decisions. The team had to adjust their game plan without one of their top players on the floor, and it had a noticeable effect on the team’s performance. The Tigers, without Reese, struggled to find their offensive rhythm and were unable to capitalize on the momentum they had built before the ejection. The game ended up being a loss for LSU, and the double ejection was a major talking point in the post-game analysis.
The backlash over the officiating didn’t just come from LSU. Oklahoma fans, too, were quick to point out the inconsistency of the call. While many agreed that the verbal altercation between Reese and Williams was heated, they also felt that the ejections had been excessive, especially given the physical nature of college basketball.
The controversy surrounding the officiating in this game brought greater attention to the SEC’s officiating issues, which had been a growing concern in the league. While the SEC had long been considered one of the most competitive conferences in women’s basketball, its officiating had come under increasing scrutiny in recent seasons. Questions about inconsistent calls, particularly in high-pressure situations, were frequently raised by coaches, players, and fans alike.
The Role of Officials in College Basketball
Officiating in college basketball is one of the most challenging aspects of the game. With the speed and intensity of the sport, officials are often tasked with making split-second decisions that can have a significant impact on the flow of the game. Given the high stakes of games involving teams like LSU and Oklahoma, the pressure on officials to get things right is amplified.
In this case, many felt that the officials failed to manage the situation properly. The double ejection seemed to be a hasty decision made in the heat of the moment rather than a measured response to the players’ behavior. While there is no denying that the players’ actions were heated, the severity of the punishment seemed disproportionate to the situation at hand. The fact that both players were ejected—especially when both had been key contributors to their teams—raised questions about the officials’ ability to maintain control of the game without overstepping.
There’s also the matter of consistency. In college basketball, players are often given more leeway in terms of physicality, especially in conference games. The decision to eject two stars in a game of this magnitude seemed to many like an overcorrection, particularly when compared to how similar incidents in other conferences might have been handled. Fans and analysts alike pointed to the inconsistency of the officiating across the country and questioned whether certain games were being called with a different standard.