Ben Johnson’s first Chicago Bears offense struggles significantly, ranked near the bottom, raising concerns about effectiveness and future adjustments.
When Ben Johnson was hired as the offensive coordinator for the Chicago Bears, there was a wave of optimism. Known for his innovative play-calling, modern offensive concepts, and success as an assistant coach in prior NFL stops, Johnson was expected to invigorate a Bears offense that had struggled to find identity and consistency for several seasons.
However, as the early part of the season unfolded, Johnson’s first offense with the Bears has encountered significant challenges. Statistical rankings and on-field performance have placed the Bears near the bottom of the league offensively. This has raised concerns among fans, analysts, and the Bears’ organization about the effectiveness of the current scheme, player execution, and what adjustments may be necessary to improve moving forward.
This article dives deep into the reasons behind the struggles of Ben Johnson’s offense, the statistical evidence, player performances, scheme fit, and what the future might hold for the Bears’ offensive unit.
Setting the Stage: Ben Johnson’s Arrival and Expectations
Ben Johnson joined the Bears with a promising résumé. Having previously served as the offensive coordinator for the Minnesota Vikings, Johnson was praised for his creativity, ability to develop quarterbacks, and adaptability in play-calling. The Bears’ front office and head coach saw him as a key figure in revitalizing the offense and complementing their evolving roster.
Expectations were that Johnson would implement a balanced, dynamic offense that maximizes the strengths of quarterback Justin Fields and the skill position players, while improving the offensive line’s performance to open up running lanes and protect the passer.
Statistical Rankings Reflect Offensive Struggles
Unfortunately, early results have not lived up to those expectations. The Bears’ offense has consistently ranked near the bottom in several critical categories, including:
- Total yards per game: The Bears offense ranks in the bottom quartile of the NFL, indicating difficulties in moving the ball effectively.
- Points per game: Scoring struggles have been evident, with the team failing to convert drives into touchdowns at an efficient rate.
- Third-down conversions: The offense has a low conversion rate on third downs, stalling drives and putting pressure on the defense.
- Red zone efficiency: The Bears have struggled to capitalize on scoring opportunities inside the 20-yard line.
- Turnovers: An above-average number of turnovers, including interceptions and fumbles, has hindered offensive momentum.
Such statistics paint a troubling picture of an offense unable to sustain drives, control the clock, or consistently produce points.
On-Field Performance: Execution vs. Scheme
The challenges faced by the Bears’ offense can be attributed to a combination of factors involving both scheme design and player execution.
Scheme Complexity and Adjustments
Ben Johnson’s offensive system is known for its complexity, relying on quick reads, timing routes, and diverse formations designed to create mismatches. While this approach can be highly effective, it requires precision, chemistry, and a deep understanding by players.
The Bears’ roster, however, is still in a development phase, particularly at quarterback and along the offensive line. The blend of youth and inexperience has led to miscommunications, missed assignments, and breakdowns in execution.
Moreover, opposing defenses have adjusted well to the Bears’ tendencies, applying pressure schemes that disrupt timing and forcing the offense out of its rhythm.
Player Execution and Injuries
Justin Fields, the Bears’ young quarterback, has shown flashes of brilliance but has also struggled with accuracy, decision-making under pressure, and injuries. The offensive line, tasked with protecting Fields and opening running lanes, has been inconsistent and at times overmatched by elite pass rushers.
The running game has lacked explosiveness and consistency, partly due to offensive line issues and partly due to design. Wide receivers and tight ends have also faced challenges in creating separation and securing contested catches.
These execution problems have compounded the difficulties faced by Johnson’s scheme.
Coaching and Play-Calling Under Scrutiny
Ben Johnson’s play-calling has been scrutinized amid the struggles. Critics point to a perceived over-reliance on certain concepts or predictable tendencies that opposing defenses have exploited.
Some analysts argue that Johnson has not fully adapted his game plan to the strengths and weaknesses of his roster, especially given the offensive line’s protection issues and Fields’ need for quick, high-percentage throws.
Others note that Johnson’s relative inexperience as a lead coordinator at the NFL level may be a factor, suggesting that growing pains are expected as he continues to develop and adjust.
Comparing to Previous Bears Offenses
While the current offense ranks near the bottom, it’s important to contextualize these struggles within the broader history of the Bears’ recent offensive performances.
For years, the Bears have grappled with offensive inconsistency, particularly at quarterback and offensive line play. Ben Johnson inherited a unit that was already in transition, which complicates immediate success.
Compared to previous seasons, there are areas of improvement—such as occasional explosive plays and better integration of modern offensive concepts—but these positives are overshadowed by the overall lack of consistent production.
Fan and Media Reaction
The Bears’ fanbase has been vocal about their frustration. Social media and sports forums are rife with calls for more aggressive adjustments, changes in play-calling, and personnel moves.
Local media have debated whether the struggles are a sign of poor coaching, player development issues, or simply the growing pains of a young offense.
This pressure adds to the challenge facing Ben Johnson and the Bears coaching staff, who must balance patience with urgency as the season progresses.
Potential Adjustments and Solutions
To address the offensive struggles, several adjustments may be necessary:
- Simplifying the Playbook: Reducing complexity to help players master core concepts and improve execution.
- Faster Passing Game: Implementing quicker throws to mitigate pass protection issues and reduce quarterback pressure.
- Improving Offensive Line Play: Investing in coaching, technique development, and potentially personnel changes to stabilize the line.
- Balancing the Run and Pass: Establishing a more effective running game to control the clock and open up play-action opportunities.
- Player Development: Focusing on improving receiver route running and catching consistency to maximize field stretching capabilities.
Looking Ahead: Is There Reason for Optimism?
Despite the current struggles, there are reasons for cautious optimism:
- Justin Fields’ Growth: Fields has demonstrated resilience and flashes of elite talent, which can flourish with better support.
- Coaching Staff Adjustments: Ben Johnson and his staff are known for adaptability, and ongoing tweaks could yield better results.
- Emerging Young Talent: Younger players on offense show potential that could mature into consistent contributors.
- Schedule and Matchups: The Bears’ schedule includes opportunities to build confidence and momentum.
The path forward will require patience from fans and clear, decisive action from the coaching staff.
Ben Johnson’s first Chicago Bears offense has faced a tough baptism, struggling significantly and ranking near the bottom of NFL offenses. The combination of scheme complexity, player execution issues, injuries, and tough competition has resulted in disappointing results.
However, the season is far from over. With the right adjustments, player development, and coaching flexibility, Johnson’s offense has the potential to improve and eventually meet the high expectations set at the start of the year.
For Bears fans, the hope is that this early adversity becomes a stepping stone toward a more productive and exciting offensive identity under Ben Johnson’s guidance.
