LSU Tigers decided to take down their original Pride post (terrible look LSU)…and I have ONE guess as to who was behind that.
The recent removal of LSU’s Pride Month post has sparked widespread speculation and controversy. While the university has not officially disclosed the reasons behind this decision, several factors suggest that political pressures and institutional decisions may have influenced the action. Notably, LSU President William Tate IV has been at the forefront of recent policy changes that align with conservative stances on diversity and inclusion.
In early 2025, LSU undertook a significant overhaul of its online presence, purging over 1,300 webpages that contained terms such as “diversity,” “equity,” “inclusion,” and “DEI.” This move was in response to guidance from the Trump administration threatening to revoke federal funding from institutions that engage in race-conscious practices. Additionally, LSU renamed its Division of Inclusion, Civil Rights & Title IX to the Division of Engagement, Civil Rights & Title IX, removing references to diversity from its website .
Given these actions, it’s plausible that the decision to remove the Pride Month post was influenced by a broader institutional shift towards aligning with conservative policies. While President Tate has not publicly commented on the specific incident, his recent initiatives suggest a pattern of decisions that prioritize alignment with conservative values over inclusive representation.
The removal of the Pride Month post has been met with criticism from various quarters, including LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and students who view the action as a step back in the university’s commitment to diversity and inclusion. The lack of transparency and communication from LSU regarding the decision has further fueled concerns about the direction in which the institution is heading.
In conclusion, while the exact reasons behind LSU’s removal of the Pride Month post remain unclear, the university’s recent actions under President William Tate IV suggest a deliberate move towards policies that may not prioritize LGBTQ+ visibility and inclusion. This development raises important questions about the future of diversity and inclusion at LSU and other institutions navigating similar political pressures.
