There were no new signees on Georgia’s signing day, indicating a change in recruitment tactics and reflecting the evolving college football landscape.

In the world of college football, National Signing Day has long been a day of excitement, filled with new recruits committing to top programs and coaches celebrating their efforts to bring in the next generation of talent. For the University of Georgia (UGA), one of the most powerful programs in college football over the past decade, this day has traditionally been a showcase of elite talent flocking to Athens, cementing the Bulldogs’ status as a national powerhouse. However, in 2024, Georgia’s signing day brought an unexpected twist: the Bulldogs did not add any new signees, signaling a major shift in their recruitment strategy and reflecting broader changes in the college football landscape.
This lack of new signings was a clear departure from the norm. Georgia, under head coach Kirby Smart, has built one of the most successful programs in college football, regularly securing top-tier recruits and stacking its roster with five-star talent. The absence of new recruits during signing day suggests that Smart and his staff are adjusting their recruitment approach in response to changes in the sport, including the influence of the transfer portal, changes to NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) policies, and the growing importance of player development over traditional high school recruiting.
This article explores the significance of Georgia’s signing day and its implications for the future of college football recruitment, shedding light on how the Bulldogs’ approach is evolving in response to changing dynamics within the sport.
The Evolution of College Football Recruitment: Shifting Priorities
To understand the significance of Georgia’s decision not to add new signees, it’s important to first look at the broader shifts that have occurred in college football recruiting over the past several years. Recruitment has always been one of the most critical elements of a football program’s success, but the ways in which coaches and programs approach it have evolved significantly, particularly in the era of NIL and the transfer portal.
The Rise of the Transfer Portal
One of the most significant changes in college football recruitment has been the rise of the transfer portal. Introduced in 2018, the portal allows players to transfer from one school to another without sitting out a season (in most cases), fundamentally altering the traditional recruiting cycle. Instead of focusing solely on high school players, many programs are now putting a greater emphasis on recruiting transfers to immediately fill gaps in their roster, particularly at key positions such as quarterback, wide receiver, and defensive back.
The portal has opened up new avenues for programs like Georgia, which can now quickly plug holes in their roster with proven college players rather than waiting for high school recruits to develop. This is particularly relevant in today’s game, where championship-caliber teams are often only a few pieces away from being truly elite. Instead of spending significant time and resources on high school recruitment, top programs are now able to go after experienced players who can make an impact immediately.
For Georgia, this shift has been particularly evident. The Bulldogs have been active in the portal, with Smart and his staff adding key pieces each year to bolster their roster. In 2024, the Bulldogs added several key transfer players, including experienced players from other top programs, giving them the ability to continue competing at the highest level without having to wait for young recruits to mature.
The Impact of NIL on Recruitment
Another major factor in the changing college football landscape is the rise of NIL. In 2021, the NCAA granted athletes the ability to profit from their name, image, and likeness, allowing players to earn money through sponsorships, endorsements, and other deals. While NIL has created new opportunities for players, it has also significantly impacted how recruits approach their college decisions and how programs recruit players.
For programs like Georgia, NIL deals have become an integral part of the recruitment process. Top recruits are now not only considering the quality of a program’s coaching staff, facilities, and tradition but also the opportunities for financial gain through NIL deals. As a result, the recruitment process has become more complex, with programs needing to navigate the competitive landscape of NIL offers and manage their relationships with potential sponsors and boosters.
This shift has led some programs, including Georgia, to reassess their approach to traditional high school recruiting. With NIL playing a central role in recruitment, Georgia’s decision to focus on other aspects of its program—such as player development, internal roster management, and the transfer portal—may reflect a desire to prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term recruiting victories.
Georgia’s 2024 Signing Day: A Sign of the Times
Against this backdrop of significant changes to the recruitment landscape, Georgia’s decision not to add any new signees on National Signing Day in 2024 makes sense within the broader context. While it may have initially raised some eyebrows, it reflects a calculated shift in strategy by Kirby Smart and his staff. Instead of relying on traditional high school recruits, Georgia’s leadership has focused its efforts on the transfer portal and on developing the talent already on the roster.
Prioritizing Development Over Recruitment
One of the reasons for Georgia’s lack of new signees is a growing emphasis on player development over traditional recruitment. Georgia has long been known for its strong player development system, and this is an area that has helped the Bulldogs consistently compete for championships. The 2024 season demonstrated the fruits of this philosophy, with Georgia continuing to churn out elite players who may not have initially been highly ranked recruits but who developed into stars under Smart’s tutelage.
This focus on development over recruitment is evident in the fact that Georgia has consistently turned three- and four-star recruits into key contributors. Players like defensive lineman Jordan Davis, who was drafted in the first round of the 2022 NFL Draft, and running back Zamir White, who was drafted into the NFL as well, were not top-five recruits out of high school but became dominant forces through strong development at Georgia.
Rather than continuing to aggressively pursue high school players and stockpile unproven talent, Smart has opted to continue building from within, ensuring that the Bulldogs maintain a competitive roster without over-relying on incoming freshmen. This approach, while unorthodox in a landscape where recruiting rankings have become increasingly important, has proven successful for Georgia, as the Bulldogs continue to field championship-caliber teams year after year.
Focusing on Internal Talent and the Transfer Portal
Instead of adding high school recruits, Georgia has focused its efforts on bolstering its roster with experienced players from the transfer portal. This decision is reflective of the evolving nature of college football recruiting, where immediate impact and experience often outweigh long-term potential. The Bulldogs have already seen success in this area, with several transfer players making significant contributions in the past few seasons.
In 2024, Georgia once again looked to the portal to address key needs, including at wide receiver and linebacker. The Bulldogs’ ability to target and sign high-quality transfers has allowed them to fill immediate needs while also maintaining a high level of competition within the roster. This strategy reflects a shift in college football, where programs are less focused on building a roster solely through high school recruiting and more focused on maintaining a competitive roster that can immediately contend for championships.
A Shift in Expectations for National Signing Day
The decision to forgo new signees on National Signing Day also signals a shift in how programs approach the day itself. In the past, signing day was seen as a major event, with coaches and fans eagerly awaiting the arrival of the next wave of talent. However, as the transfer portal has become a more prominent factor in recruiting, the importance of high school recruiting has diminished to some degree, and with it, the significance of National Signing Day.
For Georgia, signing day may have simply become less important than it once was. Instead of focusing on securing commitments from high school recruits, the Bulldogs are now placing more importance on maintaining a balanced roster, identifying key transfers, and developing internal talent. This shift reflects the changing realities of college football, where the transfer portal and NIL deals have reshaped the way teams approach team building.
What This Means for the Future of Georgia Football
Georgia’s signing day in 2024 signals a significant shift in how Kirby Smart and his staff are approaching recruitment moving forward. While traditional high school recruiting will always remain an important part of any program’s strategy, Georgia’s approach to the transfer portal, NIL, and player development is a reflection of the evolving college football landscape.
Looking ahead to 2025, Georgia is likely to continue embracing this new model, one where the emphasis is on roster management, development, and strategic use of the transfer portal. The Bulldogs’ ability to adapt to these changes will likely keep them at the forefront of college football, competing for national titles year after year.
The trend seen in Georgia’s 2024 signing day could also be a blueprint for other programs to follow. As the transfer portal and NIL continue to reshape the sport, teams will need to adapt their recruitment strategies in order to stay competitive. Georgia’s decision to focus on roster sustainability and development, rather than relying solely on high school recruiting, may become the new norm in college football as the sport continues to evolve.